Kodak Sport vs Panasonic ZS60
92 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0569d/0569dafade0baccc9203909106aacca5bdf61ca3" alt="Kodak EasyShare Sport front Kodak EasyShare Sport front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f31fa/f31fa382616d07f56a39b037c098c34aa554d874" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 front"
88 Imaging
44 Features
63 Overall
51
Kodak Sport vs Panasonic ZS60 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 282g - 112 x 64 x 38mm
- Released January 2016
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ80
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS50
- Replacement is Panasonic ZS70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Kodak Sport vs Panasonic ZS60 Overview
The following is a in-depth analysis of the Kodak Sport versus Panasonic ZS60, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Kodak and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Sport (12MP) and ZS60 (18MP) but they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The Sport was revealed 6 years before the ZS60 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple view of how the Sport matches up against the ZS60 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Kodak Sport vs Panasonic ZS60 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Sport & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60. The full galleries are available at Kodak Sport Gallery & Panasonic ZS60 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Panasonic ZS60
Sport | ZS60 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS60 over the Kodak Sport
ZS60 | Sport | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2016 | ![]() | January 2011 | Newer by 60 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 112k | Clearer display (+928k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Sport and Panasonic ZS60
Sport | ZS60 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Kodak Sport vs Panasonic ZS60 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Kodak Sport has physical measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS60 has sizing of 112mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 282 grams (0.62 lbs).
Compare the Kodak Sport versus Panasonic ZS60 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the Sport vs the ZS60.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/674bb/674bbdf63d699a820c63d45e3d16e73272598df2" alt="Kodak Sport vs Panasonic ZS60 size comparison Kodak Sport vs Panasonic ZS60 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Sport and ZS60 is 92 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63afd/63afdfd2a424a84b884bfe1939e948683f9e0548" alt="Kodak Sport vs Panasonic ZS60 top view buttons comparison Kodak Sport vs Panasonic ZS60 top view buttons comparison"
Kodak Sport vs Panasonic ZS60 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading specs. The picture below should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Sport and ZS60.
All in all, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Panasonic ZS60 to deliver greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged Sport is going to be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7889c/7889cb4b534eab4c00690549320980aea3405268" alt="Kodak Sport vs Panasonic ZS60 sensor size comparison Kodak Sport vs Panasonic ZS60 sensor size comparison"
Kodak Sport vs Panasonic ZS60 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75c57/75c57b10a550bc237b2827d2596d2eff5aeb024c" alt="Kodak Sport vs Panasonic ZS60 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak Sport vs Panasonic ZS60 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Kodak Sport vs Panasonic ZS60 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Sport | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Kodak | Panasonic |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare Sport | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ80 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-01-04 | 2016-01-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 18MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 1250 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35mm (1x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.4 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 112 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | 5.60 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 175 grams (0.39 pounds) | 282 grams (0.62 pounds) |
Dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 112 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 37 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 109 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 2 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 3 shots / 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $155 | $248 |