Clicky

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh GR Digital III

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
13
Overall
26
Kodak EasyShare Sport front
 
Ricoh GR Digital III front
Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
35
Overall
33

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs

Kodak Sport
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1250
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35mm (F3.0) lens
  • 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2011
Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Released July 2009
  • Newer Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview

Its time to take a more detailed look at the Kodak Sport versus Ricoh GR Digital III, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Kodak and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the Sport (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is relatively close but the Sport (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The Sport was introduced 18 months later than the GR Digital III which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the Sport grades against the GR Digital III with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 Sport GR Digital III 
ReleasedJanuary 2011July 2009More recent by 18 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Kodak Sport

 GR Digital III Sport 
Manually focus More precise focus
Screen size3"2.4"Bigger screen (+0.6")
Screen resolution920k112kCrisper screen (+808k dot)

Common features in the Kodak Sport and Ricoh GR Digital III

 Sport GR Digital III 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to lug around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Sport provides exterior dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital III has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).

Compare the Kodak Sport versus Ricoh GR Digital III in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the Sport versus the GR Digital III.

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Sport and GR Digital III is 92 and 92 respectively.

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements only by looking through specifications. The graphic below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Sport and GR Digital III.

Plainly, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Sport using its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Kodak Sport will provide you with extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more recent Sport will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Sport Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital III Portrait photography highlights
26
provides face detect focusing
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
39
has manual focus
supports RAW files
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Kodak Sport Street photography details
Ricoh GR Digital III Street photography details
52
environment proof
fixed screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
low maximum ISO (1,250)
55
supports RAW files
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/1.7")
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Kodak Sport as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital III as a Sports photography camera
23
environment proof
focal length is fixed (35mm)
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
16
can't change focal length (28mm)
no image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Kodak Sport Travel photography factors
Ricoh GR Digital III Travel photography factors
57
environment proof
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse function
low resolution sensor (12MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
63
has built in flash
great max aperture (f1.9)
low MP (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Sport Landscape photography features
Ricoh GR Digital III Landscape photography features
27
environment proof
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is somewhat small (2.4 inch)
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (1,250)
no RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
44
has manual focus
great max aperture (f1.9)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
supports RAW files
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
no image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Sport Vlogging details
Ricoh GR Digital III Vlogging details
25
provides face detect focusing
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of microphone socket
25
great max aperture (f1.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of mic support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Sport and Ricoh GR Digital III
 Kodak EasyShare SportRicoh GR Digital III
General Information
Company Kodak Ricoh
Model Kodak EasyShare Sport Ricoh GR Digital III
Type Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2011-01-04 2009-07-27
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - GR engine III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1250 1600
Min native ISO 80 64
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35mm (1x) 28mm (1x)
Max aperture f/3.0 f/1.9
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.4 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 112 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 8 seconds 1 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 175 gr (0.39 lbs) 208 gr (0.46 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 2 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at release $155 $399