Clicky

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
13
Overall
26
Kodak EasyShare Sport front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Kodak Sport
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1250
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35mm (F3.0) lens
  • 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2011
  • Previous Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

Let's take a closer look at the Kodak Sport vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Kodak and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the Sport (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is pretty well matched but the Sport (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") possess different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The Sport was announced 8 months before the GR Digital IV so they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the Sport matches up against the GR Digital IV when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 Sport GR Digital IV 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Kodak Sport

 GR Digital IV Sport 
LaunchedSeptember 2011January 2011Newer by 8 months
Focus manually More precise focus
Screen dimension3"2.4"Bigger screen (+0.6")
Screen resolution1230k112kCrisper screen (+1118k dot)

Common features in the Kodak Sport and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 Sport GR Digital IV 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Kodak Sport provides outside measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

See the Kodak Sport vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the Sport against the GR Digital IV.

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Sport and GR Digital IV is 92 and 92 respectively.

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions only by checking specifications. The image below may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Sport and GR Digital IV.

To sum up, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Sport having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Kodak Sport will resolve extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged Sport is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Sport Portrait photography info
Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography info
26
offers face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
41
focusing manually
delivers RAW formats
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Kodak Sport Street photography features
Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography features
52
weather proof
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
max ISO too low (1,250)
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Kodak Sport Sports photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography highlights
23
weather proof
fixed focal length (35mm)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good battery life (390 shots)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Kodak Sport Travel photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography highlights
57
weather proof
flash built-in
missing Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
67
good battery life (390 CIPA)
built-in flash
very good max aperture (f1.9)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak Sport
Landscape photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
27
weather proof
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
tiny screen (2.4")
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (1,250)
doesn't have RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
53
focusing manually
very good max aperture (f1.9)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
good battery life (390 shots)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Sport Vlogging information
Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging information
25
offers face detection focusing
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external microphone jack
29
very good max aperture (f1.9)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
missing mic port
Photography Glossary

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Sport and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Kodak EasyShare SportRicoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Make Kodak Ricoh
Model type Kodak EasyShare Sport Ricoh GR Digital IV
Type Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2011-01-04 2011-09-15
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1250 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35mm (1x) 28mm (1x)
Max aperture f/3.0 f/1.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.4 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 112k dot 1,230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s 1s
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 175g (0.39 pounds) 190g (0.42 pounds)
Dimensions 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 390 images
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID 2 x AA DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Retail pricing $155 $599