Clicky

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh WG-M1

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
13
Overall
26
Kodak EasyShare Sport front
 
Ricoh WG-M1 front
Portability
91
Imaging
38
Features
22
Overall
31

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs

Kodak Sport
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1250
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35mm (F3.0) lens
  • 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 1.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
  • 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
  • Launched September 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview

Here, we are matching up the Kodak Sport and Ricoh WG-M1, both Waterproof cameras by brands Kodak and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Sport (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

The Sport was unveiled 4 years before the WG-M1 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short overview of how the Sport grades against the WG-M1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Ricoh WG-M1

 Sport WG-M1 
Display size2.4"1.5"Larger display (+0.9")

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Kodak Sport

 WG-M1 Sport 
LaunchedSeptember 2014January 2011More modern by 44 months
Display resolution115k112kSharper display (+3k dot)

Common features in the Kodak Sport and Ricoh WG-M1

 Sport WG-M1 
Manual focus Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak Sport has outside dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Check out the Kodak Sport and Ricoh WG-M1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the Sport compared to the WG-M1.

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Sport and WG-M1 is 92 and 91 respectively.

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its hard to see the gap in sensor sizes just by researching specifications. The pic underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Sport and WG-M1.

To sum up, both cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-M1 to render more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged Sport will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Sport as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh WG-M1 as a Portrait photography camera
26
features face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
no external flash support
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
29
decent MP (14MP)
manual focus not available
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Kodak Sport Street photography details
Ricoh WG-M1 Street photography details
52
environment proof
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
max ISO too low (1,250)
52
weather proofing
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
maximum ISO low (800)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak Sport
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-M1
23
environment proof
can't change focal length (35mm)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
37
decent MP (14MP)
weather proofing
better than average battery (350 per charge)
can't change focal length ((1×)mm)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Kodak Sport Travel photography info
Ricoh WG-M1 Travel photography info
57
environment proof
built-in flash
no Time Lapse mode
low MP (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
64
better than average battery (350 shots)
weather proofing
decent MP (14MP)
missing Timelapse mode
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Sport Landscape photography information
Ricoh WG-M1 Landscape photography information
27
environment proof
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is small (2.4 inches)
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (1,250)
has no RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
35
decent MP (14 megapixels)
weather proofing
better than average battery (350 shots)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length ((1×)mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (1.5 inch)
no manual mode
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (800)
has no RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak Sport
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-M1
25
features face detection focus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
no external mic port
26
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
missing external microphone support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak Sport vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Sport and Ricoh WG-M1
 Kodak EasyShare SportRicoh WG-M1
General Information
Make Kodak Ricoh
Model Kodak EasyShare Sport Ricoh WG-M1
Type Waterproof Waterproof
Revealed 2011-01-04 2014-09-12
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 1250 800
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35mm (1x) (1×)
Largest aperture f/3.0 f/2.8
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.4 inch 1.5 inch
Resolution of screen 112k dots 115k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds -
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400 seconds -
Continuous shooting rate - 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 175 grams (0.39 pounds) 190 grams (0.42 pounds)
Physical dimensions 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 350 pictures
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model 2 x AA DB-65
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal microSD/microSDHC, internal
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $155 $2,000