Clicky

Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
13
Overall
26
Kodak EasyShare Sport front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Kodak Sport
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1250
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35mm (F3.0) lens
  • 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Announced January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB35F Overview

Below, we will be comparing the Kodak Sport and Samsung WB35F, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Kodak and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the Sport (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The Sport was announced 4 years before the WB35F which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief view of how the Sport scores versus the WB35F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Samsung WB35F

 Sport WB35F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Kodak Sport

 WB35F Sport 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014January 2011More modern by 36 months
Focus manually Very precise focus
Screen dimension2.7"2.4"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution230k112kSharper screen (+118k dot)

Common features in the Kodak Sport and Samsung WB35F

 Sport WB35F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Sport has got outer dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Examine the Kodak Sport and Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the Sport against the WB35F.

Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Sport and WB35F is 92 and 93 respectively.

Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading through technical specs. The image underneath will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Sport and WB35F.

As you have seen, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Samsung WB35F to give greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged Sport is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Sport as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Portrait photography camera
26
includes face detection focus
manual focus not available
no manual control
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
37
focusing manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Kodak Sport Street photography information
Samsung WB35F Street photography information
52
environment proof
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
maximum ISO low (1,250)
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (194 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Kodak Sport Sports photography information
Samsung WB35F Sports photography information
23
environment proof
fixed focal length (35mm)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
40
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Kodak Sport Travel photography advice
Samsung WB35F Travel photography advice
57
environment proof
has built in flash
no Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
70
lighter than competition in class (194g)
MP count good (16MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
long reach (288mm)
no Time Lapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak Sport
Landscape photography with Samsung WB35F
27
environment proof
manual focus not available
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
tiny screen (2.4 inch)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (1,250)
lacks RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
43
focusing manually
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.7")
manual exposure not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Sport Vlogging details
Samsung WB35F Vlogging details
25
includes face detection focus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
no external mic jack
31
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (194g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not have a selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Sport and Samsung WB35F
 Kodak EasyShare SportSamsung WB35F
General Information
Brand Kodak Samsung
Model type Kodak EasyShare Sport Samsung WB35F
Category Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2011-01-04 2014-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1250 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35mm (1x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Max aperture f/3.0 f/3.1-6.3
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.4" 2.7"
Resolution of display 112k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 175 gr (0.39 lbs) 194 gr (0.43 lbs)
Dimensions 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 2 x AA BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $155 $130