Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB50F
92 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Released January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Here is a thorough overview of the Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB50F, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Kodak and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the Sport (12MP) and WB50F (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Sport was unveiled 4 years before the WB50F and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the Sport grades against the WB50F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Sport & Samsung WB50F. The full galleries are viewable at Kodak Sport Gallery & Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Samsung WB50F
| Sport | WB50F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Kodak Sport
| WB50F | Sport | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 | January 2011 | Fresher by 36 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 112k | Clearer screen (+348k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Sport and Samsung WB50F
| Sport | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Kodak Sport features outside dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB50F has sizing of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Check the Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB50F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the Sport versus the WB50F.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Sport and WB50F is 92 and 92 respectively.
Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specifications. The graphic here might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Sport and WB50F.
To sum up, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Samsung WB50F to offer you greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The older Sport is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Sport | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Sport | Samsung WB50F |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-01-04 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1250 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.4 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 112 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175 grams (0.39 lb) | 207 grams (0.46 lb) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $155 | $180 |