Clicky

Kodak Touch vs Olympus VG-120

Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
34
Overall
34
Kodak EasyShare Touch front
 
Olympus VG-120 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31

Kodak Touch vs Olympus VG-120 Key Specs

Kodak Touch
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Olympus VG-120
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak Touch vs Olympus VG-120 Overview

Below, we are contrasting the Kodak Touch and Olympus VG-120, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the Touch (14MP) and the VG-120 (14MP) is fairly similar but the Touch (1/3") and VG-120 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The Touch was released at a similar time to the VG-120 and they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the Touch scores versus the VG-120 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Olympus VG-120

 Touch VG-120 
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Kodak Touch

 VG-120 Touch 

Common features in the Kodak Touch and Olympus VG-120

 Touch VG-120 
LaunchedJanuary 2011January 2011Similar age
Manual focus Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display size
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Kodak Touch vs Olympus VG-120 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to carry around your camera, you should think about its weight and size. The Kodak Touch features outer measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-120 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).

Contrast the Kodak Touch and Olympus VG-120 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the Touch compared to the VG-120.

Kodak Touch vs Olympus VG-120 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Touch and VG-120 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak Touch vs Olympus VG-120 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Touch vs Olympus VG-120 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading specs. The picture below will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Touch and VG-120.

All in all, the 2 cameras posses the exact same MP but not the same sensor sizes. The Touch uses the tinier sensor which should make obtaining shallower DOF trickier.

Kodak Touch vs Olympus VG-120 sensor size comparison

Kodak Touch vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Touch vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Touch Portrait photography information
Olympus VG-120 Portrait photography information
32
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
provides face detection autofocus
no manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/3")
lacks RAW format
33
good resolution (14 megapixels)
has face detect focus
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Kodak Touch as a Street photography camera
Olympus VG-120 as a Street photography camera
47
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/3")
lacks RAW format
heavier than average in class (150g)
48
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Kodak Touch Sports photography details
Olympus VG-120 Sports photography details
27
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
26
good resolution (14MP)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (160 per charge)
has no phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Kodak Touch Travel photography highlights
Olympus VG-120 Travel photography highlights
67
megapixel count good (14MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than average in class (150g)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
62
good resolution (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (26mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
terrible battery life (160 per charge)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak Touch
Landscape photography with Olympus VG-120
41
fairly wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
megapixel count good (14MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/3")
lacks RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
36
fairly wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
terrible battery life (160 per charge)
lack of Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Touch as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VG-120 as a Vlogging camera
31
fairly wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
touch screen
provides face detection autofocus
doesn't have selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic port
heavier than average in class (150g)
28
fairly wide (26mm)
has face detect focus
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak Touch vs Olympus VG-120 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Touch and Olympus VG-120
 Kodak EasyShare TouchOlympus VG-120
General Information
Manufacturer Kodak Olympus
Model type Kodak EasyShare Touch Olympus VG-120
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2011-01-04 2011-01-06
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 4.8 x 3.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 17.3mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 26-130mm (5.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.8-6.5
Macro focusing distance 5cm 7cm
Crop factor 7.5 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech TFT color LCD TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1600 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.20 m 4.40 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 150g (0.33 lbs) 120g (0.26 lbs)
Dimensions 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 160 photos
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery ID KLIC-7006 LI-70B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC
Card slots One One
Price at release $100 $190