Clicky

Kodak Touch vs Panasonic FS42

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
34
Overall
35
Kodak EasyShare Touch front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front
Portability
95
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23

Kodak Touch vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs

Kodak Touch
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Panasonic FS42
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000 (Push to 6400)
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
  • Announced April 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak Touch vs Panasonic FS42 Overview

On this page, we are looking at the Kodak Touch versus Panasonic FS42, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Panasonic. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the Touch (14MP) and FS42 (10MP) and the Touch (1/3") and FS42 (1/2.5") have different sensor size.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The Touch was unveiled 21 months after the FS42 making them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the Touch grades vs the FS42 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Panasonic FS42

 Touch FS42 
AnnouncedJanuary 2011April 2009More modern by 21 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Kodak Touch

 FS42 Touch 

Common features in the Kodak Touch and Panasonic FS42

 Touch FS42 
Focus manually No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Kodak Touch vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Kodak Touch enjoys outside measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Panasonic FS42 has proportions of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).

Check the Kodak Touch versus Panasonic FS42 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the Touch compared to the FS42.

Kodak Touch vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Touch and FS42 is 95 and 95 respectively.

Kodak Touch vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Touch vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specs. The pic below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Touch and FS42.

All in all, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Touch with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Kodak Touch will offer more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The younger Touch provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Kodak Touch vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison

Kodak Touch vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Touch vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Touch as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic FS42 as a Portrait photography camera
33
decent megapixels (14MP)
comes with face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/3")
lacks RAW format
19
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
does not have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Kodak Touch Street photography advice
Panasonic FS42 Street photography advice
48
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/3")
lacks RAW format
more heavy than average (150g)
47
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
does not have RAW files
low max ISO (1,000)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Kodak Touch Sports photography features
Panasonic FS42 Sports photography features
28
decent megapixels (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
16
low frames per second (2.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
does not have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak Touch
Travel photography with Panasonic FS42
68
decent megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than average (150g)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
51
flash built-in
missing Timelapse function
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Touch Landscape photography details
Panasonic FS42 Landscape photography details
42
reasonably wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/3")
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse function
22
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
low max ISO (1,000)
does not have RAW files
missing Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak Touch
Vlogging with Panasonic FS42
31
reasonably wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
has touchscreen
comes with face detect focus
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have microphone port
more heavy than average (150 grams)
22
wide angle not great (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external microphone port
Photography Glossary

Kodak Touch vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Touch and Panasonic FS42
 Kodak EasyShare TouchPanasonic Lumix DMC-FS42
General Information
Company Kodak Panasonic
Model Kodak EasyShare Touch Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2011-01-04 2009-04-17
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/3" 1/2.5"
Sensor measurements 4.8 x 3.6mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor area 17.3mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1600 1000
Max boosted ISO - 6400
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 33-132mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus range 5cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 7.5 6.3
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 2.5 inch
Screen resolution 460 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/1600s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed - 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.20 m 6.30 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 150 grams (0.33 lb) 132 grams (0.29 lb)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7006 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $100 $580