Clicky

Kodak Touch vs Pentax Efina

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
34
Overall
35
Kodak EasyShare Touch front
 
Pentax Efina front
Portability
97
Imaging
38
Features
26
Overall
33

Kodak Touch vs Pentax Efina Key Specs

Kodak Touch
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Released January 2011
Pentax Efina
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
  • 91g - 87 x 54 x 21mm
  • Introduced June 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak Touch vs Pentax Efina Overview

Below is a in-depth comparison of the Kodak Touch vs Pentax Efina, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Kodak and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the Touch (14MP) and the Efina (14MP) is fairly similar but the Touch (1/3") and Efina (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Touch was launched 3 years prior to the Efina and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the Touch scores against the Efina for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Pentax Efina

 Touch Efina 
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Pentax Efina over the Kodak Touch

 Efina Touch 
IntroducedJune 2013January 2011More recent by 29 months

Common features in the Kodak Touch and Pentax Efina

 Touch Efina 
Focus manually Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Kodak Touch vs Pentax Efina Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Kodak Touch offers outside dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Pentax Efina has specifications of 87mm x 54mm x 21mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 91 grams (0.20 lbs).

Contrast the Kodak Touch vs Pentax Efina in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the Touch versus the Efina.

Kodak Touch vs Pentax Efina size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Touch and Efina is 95 and 97 respectively.

Kodak Touch vs Pentax Efina top view buttons comparison

Kodak Touch vs Pentax Efina Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements only by reading specifications. The graphic below will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Touch and Efina.

To sum up, each of these cameras have the same MP but not the same sensor measurements. The Touch features the tinier sensor which is going to make getting shallow DOF tougher. The older Touch is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Kodak Touch vs Pentax Efina sensor size comparison

Kodak Touch vs Pentax Efina Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Touch vs Pentax Efina Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Touch Portrait photography info
Pentax Efina Portrait photography info
33
decent MP (14 megapixels)
has face detect focusing
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
small sensor (1/3")
doesn't have RAW format
34
MP count good (14MP)
provides face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Kodak Touch as a Street photography camera
Pentax Efina as a Street photography camera
48
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/3")
doesn't have RAW format
more heavy than competitors (150 grams)
64
built in image stabilization (Digital)
lighter than competition in class (91g)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Kodak Touch Sports photography factors
Pentax Efina Sports photography factors
28
decent MP (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
35
built in image stabilization (Digital)
MP count good (14MP)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Kodak Touch Travel photography highlights
Pentax Efina Travel photography highlights
68
decent MP (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors (150g)
screen is not selfie friendly
69
lighter than competition in class (91g)
MP count good (14MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (26mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
does not posses selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Touch Landscape photography factors
Pentax Efina Landscape photography factors
42
really wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/3")
doesn't have RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
38
fairly wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.5 inch)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Touch Vlogging features
Pentax Efina Vlogging features
31
really wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
screen is touchscreen
has face detect focusing
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have microphone support
more heavy than competitors (150g)
33
fairly wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
provides face detect autofocus
lighter than competition in class (91 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak Touch vs Pentax Efina Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Touch and Pentax Efina
 Kodak EasyShare TouchPentax Efina
General Information
Manufacturer Kodak Pentax
Model Kodak EasyShare Touch Pentax Efina
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2011-01-04 2013-06-03
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 4.8 x 3.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 17.3mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 26-130mm (5.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.5-6.3
Macro focus distance 5cm 20cm
Focal length multiplier 7.5 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 2.5 inch
Display resolution 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology TFT color LCD QVGA TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8s 1/8s
Max shutter speed 1/1600s 1/1400s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.20 m 4.10 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720, 640 x 480
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 150 gr (0.33 pounds) 91 gr (0.20 pounds)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") 87 x 54 x 21mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 200 shots
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7006 D-LI109
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal SC/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $100 $10