Clicky

Kodak Touch vs Samsung ST95

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
34
Overall
35
Kodak EasyShare Touch front
 
Samsung ST95 front
Portability
99
Imaging
39
Features
19
Overall
31

Kodak Touch vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs

Kodak Touch
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Announced January 2011
Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2011
Photography Glossary

Kodak Touch vs Samsung ST95 Overview

Below is a detailed comparison of the Kodak Touch versus Samsung ST95, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Kodak and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Touch (14MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is very close but the Touch (1/3") and ST95 (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The Touch was unveiled within a month of the ST95 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the Touch grades versus the ST95 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Samsung ST95

 Touch ST95 
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Kodak Touch

 ST95 Touch 

Common features in the Kodak Touch and Samsung ST95

 Touch ST95 
LaunchedJanuary 2011January 2011Same age
Manual focus No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing
Display resolution460k460kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Kodak Touch vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Kodak Touch has external dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST95 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Take a look at the Kodak Touch versus Samsung ST95 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the Touch compared to the ST95.

Kodak Touch vs Samsung ST95 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Touch and ST95 is 95 and 99 respectively.

Kodak Touch vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Touch vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing specifications. The visual below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Touch and ST95.

Plainly, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Touch with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Samsung ST95 will render more detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively.

Kodak Touch vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison

Kodak Touch vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Touch vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak Touch
Portrait photography with Samsung ST95
33
resolution is good (14MP)
has face detect focus
manual focus not available
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/3")
has no RAW files
30
decent megapixels (16MP)
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Kodak Touch Street photography information
Samsung ST95 Street photography information
48
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than others in class (150g)
50
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
maximum ISO low (0)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Kodak Touch Sports photography details
Samsung ST95 Sports photography details
28
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/3")
has no phase detect auto focus
27
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
fixed focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Kodak Touch Travel photography info
Samsung ST95 Travel photography info
68
resolution is good (14MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than others in class (150g)
display is not selfie friendly
71
decent megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
great max aperture (f)
does not have Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak Touch
Landscape photography with Samsung ST95
42
decently wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
screen is a good size (3")
resolution is good (14MP)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/3")
has no RAW files
no Timelapse mode
38
great max aperture (f)
decent sized screen (3")
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (0)
no RAW format
does not have Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak Touch
Vlogging with Samsung ST95
31
decently wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
touchscreen
has face detect focus
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
no microphone port
more heavy than others in class (150g)
27
great max aperture (f)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak Touch vs Samsung ST95 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Touch and Samsung ST95
 Kodak EasyShare TouchSamsung ST95
General Information
Company Kodak Samsung
Model type Kodak EasyShare Touch Samsung ST95
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2011-01-04 2011-01-19
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 4.8 x 3.6mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 17.3mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 -
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) ()
Macro focusing distance 5cm -
Crop factor 7.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 460k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1600 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.20 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 150 gr (0.33 lb) -
Dimensions 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7006 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Storage type MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal -
Card slots 1 1
Launch pricing $100 $145