Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL205
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternative Name is PL100
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL205 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Kodak Touch and Samsung TL205, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Kodak and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Touch (14MP) and the TL205 (12MP) is fairly close but the Touch (1/3") and TL205 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Touch was introduced 13 months later than the TL205 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summation of how the Touch matches up against the TL205 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL205 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare Touch and Samsung TL205. The whole galleries are viewable at Kodak Touch Gallery and Samsung TL205 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Samsung TL205
| Touch | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 13 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Kodak Touch
| TL205 | Touch |
|---|
Common features in the Kodak Touch and Samsung TL205
| Touch | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL205 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Touch has got outside measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL205 has dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Compare the Kodak Touch and Samsung TL205 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the Touch compared to the TL205.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Touch and TL205 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL205 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements simply by viewing specifications. The photograph here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Touch and TL205.
To sum up, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Touch with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Kodak Touch will result in extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more modern Touch is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL205 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL205 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Touch | Samsung TL205 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Touch | Samsung TL205 |
| Also referred to as | - | PL100 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2011-01-04 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 17.3mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 7.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 150 gr (0.33 lb) | 177 gr (0.39 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $100 | $180 |
