Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL240
Portability
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Portability
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
Kodak Touch
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Launched January 2011
Samsung TL240
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Alternative Name is ST5000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Kodak Touch and Samsung TL240, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Kodak and Samsung. The image resolution of the Touch (14MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is pretty close but the Touch (1/3") and TL240 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Touch was released 13 months later than the TL240 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the Touch grades versus the TL240 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Touch and Samsung TL240. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak Touch Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Samsung TL240
| Touch | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 13 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Kodak Touch
| TL240 | Touch | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Kodak Touch and Samsung TL240
| Touch | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak Touch offers outer dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Samsung TL240 has proportions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Kodak Touch and Samsung TL240 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the Touch vs the TL240.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Touch and TL240 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements purely by looking through a spec sheet. The visual underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Touch and TL240.
As you can see, both of the cameras come with the identical MP albeit not the same sensor measurements. The Touch features the smaller sensor which is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult. The fresher Touch is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Kodak Touch as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung TL240 as a Portrait photography camera
MP count good (14 megapixels)
includes face detect focusing
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/3")
lacks RAW support
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Street photography with Kodak Touch
Street photography with Samsung TL240
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/3")
lacks RAW support
more heavy than others (150 grams)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports touch focus
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
more heavy than competitors in class (160 grams)
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Kodak Touch Sports photography details
Samsung TL240 Sports photography details
MP count good (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/3")
lacks phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Kodak Touch
Travel photography with Samsung TL240
MP count good (14MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than others (150g)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
supports touch focus
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors in class (160g)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (31mm)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Kodak Touch Landscape photography info
Samsung TL240 Landscape photography info
quite wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3")
MP count good (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual mode
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/3")
lacks RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse function
screen larger than average (3.5 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (31mm)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Kodak Touch Vlogging factors
Samsung TL240 Vlogging factors
quite wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
built-in touchscreen
includes face detect focusing
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone socket
more heavy than others (150g)
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (31mm)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone port
more heavy than competitors in class (160 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Touch | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Touch | Samsung TL240 |
| Other name | - | ST5000 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2011-01-04 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 17.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 4800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 7.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 150 grams (0.33 pounds) | 160 grams (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $100 | $171 |