Clicky

Kodak Touch vs Sony T99

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
34
Overall
35
Kodak EasyShare Touch front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
27
Overall
33

Kodak Touch vs Sony T99 Key Specs

Kodak Touch
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Sony T99
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
  • 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
  • Announced July 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak Touch vs Sony T99 Overview

On this page, we will be reviewing the Kodak Touch vs Sony T99, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Kodak and Sony. The sensor resolution of the Touch (14MP) and the T99 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the Touch (1/3") and T99 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Touch was announced 6 months after the T99 so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the Touch grades versus the T99 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Sony T99

 Touch T99 
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony T99 over the Kodak Touch

 T99 Touch 

Common features in the Kodak Touch and Sony T99

 Touch T99 
AnnouncedJanuary 2011July 2010Similar age
Focus manually No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Kodak Touch vs Sony T99 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Kodak Touch offers external measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Sony T99 has sizing of 93mm x 56mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).

Take a look at the Kodak Touch vs Sony T99 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the Touch against the T99.

Kodak Touch vs Sony T99 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Touch and T99 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak Touch vs Sony T99 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Touch vs Sony T99 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by checking a spec sheet. The picture here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Touch and T99.

As you can see, each of these cameras have the same MP albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The Touch has the tinier sensor which is going to make getting shallower depth of field tougher.

Kodak Touch vs Sony T99 sensor size comparison

Kodak Touch vs Sony T99 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Touch vs Sony T99 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak Touch
Portrait photography with Sony T99
33
MP count good (14MP)
includes face detect autofocus
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/3")
lacks RAW files
28
decent MP (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Kodak Touch as a Street photography camera
Sony T99 as a Street photography camera
48
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/3")
lacks RAW files
heavier than competition (150 grams)
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Kodak Touch Sports photography factors
Sony T99 Sports photography factors
28
MP count good (14MP)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
35
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14MP)
low max shutter speed (1/1,250 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Kodak Touch Travel photography details
Sony T99 Travel photography details
68
MP count good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (150g)
display is not selfie friendly
65
decent MP (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Touch Landscape photography info
Sony T99 Landscape photography info
42
fairly wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3")
MP count good (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/3")
lacks RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
42
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual exposure
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak Touch
Vlogging with Sony T99
31
fairly wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
built-in touchscreen
includes face detect autofocus
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic port
heavier than competition (150g)
31
reasonably wide (25mm)
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Optical)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone support
Photography Glossary

Kodak Touch vs Sony T99 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Touch and Sony T99
 Kodak EasyShare TouchSony Cyber-shot DSC-T99
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Sony
Model Kodak EasyShare Touch Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Revealed 2011-01-04 2010-07-08
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 4.8 x 3.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 17.3mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.5-4.6
Macro focus distance 5cm 1cm
Crop factor 7.5 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 2 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/1600 seconds 1/1250 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.20 m 4.60 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red eye, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 150 gr (0.33 lb) 121 gr (0.27 lb)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7006 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1, portrait2)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $100 $179