Kodak Touch vs Sony TX200V
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Kodak Touch vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Released January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak Touch vs Sony TX200V Overview
Below is a complete assessment of the Kodak Touch and Sony TX200V, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Kodak and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the Touch (14MP) and TX200V (18MP) and the Touch (1/3") and TX200V (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Touch was released 13 months before the TX200V making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summary of how the Touch grades vs the TX200V for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak Touch vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Touch and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak Touch Gallery and Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Sony TX200V
| Touch | TX200V |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Kodak Touch
| TX200V | Touch | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 13 months |
| Display sizing | 3.3" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Touch and Sony TX200V
| Touch | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Kodak Touch vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and size. The Kodak Touch offers exterior dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has specifications of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Kodak Touch and Sony TX200V in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the Touch compared to the TX200V.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Touch and TX200V is 95 and 96 respectively.
Kodak Touch vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reviewing specifications. The photograph underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Touch and TX200V.
Plainly, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Touch featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Sony TX200V will offer more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The older Touch is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Kodak Touch vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Kodak Touch vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Touch | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Sony |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Touch | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2011-01-04 | 2012-01-30 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 17.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 7.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3.3" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 2s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 150 gr (0.33 lb) | 129 gr (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $100 | $500 |