Clicky

Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus TG-320

Portability
91 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS front
 
Olympus TG-320 front
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35

Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs

Kodak Z1485 IS
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/1.72" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-175mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
  • Launched January 2009
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus TG-320 Overview

Let's look more closely at the Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus TG-320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the Z1485 IS (14MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is very similar but the Z1485 IS (1/1.72") and TG-320 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The Z1485 IS was released 4 years before the TG-320 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summary of how the Z1485 IS grades against the TG-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Kodak Z1485 IS over the Olympus TG-320

          

          

            
 Z1485 IS TG-320 
Manually focus  Very exact focusing
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Kodak Z1485 IS

          

          

            
 TG-320 Z1485 IS 
AnnouncedJanuary 2012January 2009Fresher by 36 months
Display dimensions2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Kodak Z1485 IS and Olympus TG-320

          

          

            
 Z1485 IS TG-320 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen  Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display  Neither contains Touch display
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
In case you're aiming to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Kodak Z1485 IS has got outer dimensions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus TG-320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the Z1485 IS vs the TG-320.
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Z1485 IS and TG-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Often, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by going over technical specs. The graphic below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z1485 IS and TG-320.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide the same MP but different sensor sizing. The Z1485 IS offers the larger sensor which is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult. The older Z1485 IS is going to be behind in sensor technology.

            Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
 Kodak Z1485 IS as a Portrait photography camera
 Olympus TG-320 as a Portrait photography camera
35
 manual focus
 megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
 lack of manual mode
 can't use external flash
 sensor size is very small (1/1.72")
 lacks RAW support
33
 decent sensor resolution (14MP)
 has face detect focus
 manual focus not available
 no manual exposure
 cannot use external flash
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Street Comparison
Kodak Z1485 IS Street photography features
Olympus TG-320 Street photography features
55
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 no articulating screen
 sensor size is very small (1/1.72")
 lacks RAW support
66
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 weather proof
 lighter than average in class (155g)
 screen does not articulate
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Sports Comparison
Kodak Z1485 IS Sports photography factors
Olympus TG-320 Sports photography factors
35
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 megapixel count decent (14MP)
 slow frames per second (2.0 fps)
 no shutter priority mode
 sensor size is very small (1/1.72")
 lacks phase detect autofocus
40
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
 has tracking focus
 weather proof
 max fps low (1.0 frames per second)
 no shutter priority
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 not so great battery (150 shots)
 doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Travel Comparison
Kodak Z1485 IS Travel photography information
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography information
57
 megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
 built-in flash
 lack of Time Lapse function
 doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
 wide angle not good (35mm)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
67
 lighter than average in class (155 grams)
 weather proof
 decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
 has built in flash
 pretty wide (28mm)
 missing Time Lapse function
 not so great battery (150 CIPA)
 doesn't have selfie friendly screen
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Landscape Comparison
Kodak Z1485 IS Landscape photography highlights
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography highlights
37
 manual focus
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 megapixel count decent (14MP)
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 wide angle not good (35mm)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
 screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
 lack of manual mode
 sensor size is very small (1/1.72")
 lacks RAW support
 lack of Time Lapse function
39
 pretty wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent sensor resolution (14MP)
 weather proof
 manual focus not available
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 small screen (2.7")
 no manual exposure
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
 not so great battery (150 shots)
 missing Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Z1485 IS Vlogging details
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging details
25
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 wide angle not good (35mm)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
 doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
 video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
 lack of external mic jack
32
 pretty wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 has face detect focus
 lighter than average in class (155 grams)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 doesn't have selfie friendly screen
 video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
 missing mic jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
        
                
        

          

            
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Z1485 IS and Olympus TG-320
 Kodak EasyShare Z1485 ISOlympus TG-320
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS Olympus TG-320
Type Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Launched 2009-01-08 2012-01-10
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.72" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.4 x 5.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 -
Highest resolution 4352 x 3264 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 6400 1600
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW pictures    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
AF touch    
Continuous AF    
Single AF    
Tracking AF    
AF selectice    
Center weighted AF    
AF multi area    
Live view AF    
Face detection focusing    
Contract detection focusing    
Phase detection focusing    
Number of focus points 25 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-175mm (5.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.5-5.1
Macro focus distance 10cm 3cm
Crop factor 4.9 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch functionality    
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 2.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual exposure    
Change WB    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash range 5.80 m 5.80 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe    
AE bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 194 grams (0.43 lb) 155 grams (0.34 lb)
Physical dimensions 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 150 photographs
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model 2 x AA LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse feature    
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $179 $0