Clicky

Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
25
Overall
31
Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS front
 
Olympus TG-820 iHS front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
37
Overall
35

Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs

Kodak Z1485 IS
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/1.72" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-175mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
  • Launched January 2009
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
  • Launched February 2012
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview

On this page, we are matching up the Kodak Z1485 IS versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Kodak and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Z1485 IS (14MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is fairly well matched but the Z1485 IS (1/1.72") and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The Z1485 IS was manufactured 4 years before the TG-820 iHS which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short introduction of how the Z1485 IS grades versus the TG-820 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Kodak Z1485 IS over the Olympus TG-820 iHS

 Z1485 IS TG-820 iHS 
Manual focus More exact focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Kodak Z1485 IS

 TG-820 iHS Z1485 IS 
LaunchedFebruary 2012January 2009More modern by 37 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1030k230kSharper display (+800k dot)

Common features in the Kodak Z1485 IS and Olympus TG-820 iHS

 Z1485 IS TG-820 iHS 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison

If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Kodak Z1485 IS features external measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has specifications of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).

Take a look at the Kodak Z1485 IS versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the Z1485 IS vs the TG-820 iHS.

Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Z1485 IS and TG-820 iHS is 91 and 92 respectively.

Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison

Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison

Usually, its difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes merely by checking specifications. The pic here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Z1485 IS and TG-820 iHS.

To sum up, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Z1485 IS featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Kodak Z1485 IS will give more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged Z1485 IS is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison

Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Z1485 IS Portrait photography info
Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography info
34
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (14MP)
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/1.72")
has no RAW files
26
has face detection focusing
manual focus not available
no manual control
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Kodak Z1485 IS Street photography factors
Olympus TG-820 iHS Street photography factors
55
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/1.72")
has no RAW files
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Kodak Z1485 IS Sports photography features
Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography features
34
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14MP)
slow frames per second (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/1.72")
has no phase detect AF
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking autofocus
environment proof
max fps low (5.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
low battery pack (220 CIPA)
does not have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Kodak Z1485 IS as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Travel photography camera
56
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
58
environment proof
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse function
low battery pack (220 per charge)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Z1485 IS as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Landscape photography camera
37
you can focus manually
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.5 inch)
manual mode not available
tiny sensor size (1/1.72")
has no RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
38
pretty wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
manual focus not available
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
no manual control
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
low battery pack (220 per charge)
lack of Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Z1485 IS Vlogging advice
Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging advice
25
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have mic port
33
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
lack of external microphone socket
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Z1485 IS and Olympus TG-820 iHS
 Kodak EasyShare Z1485 ISOlympus TG-820 iHS
General Information
Brand Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS Olympus TG-820 iHS
Type Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Launched 2009-01-08 2012-02-08
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic VI
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.72" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.4 x 5.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 41.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 4352 x 3264 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 6400 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-175mm (5.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.9-5.9
Macro focus distance 10cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 4.9 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 1,030 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 2.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.80 m 3.50 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 194 grams (0.43 pounds) 206 grams (0.45 pounds)
Physical dimensions 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 220 photos
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model 2 x AA LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $179 $500