Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus XZ-1
91 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/1.72" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Released January 2011
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Kodak Z1485 IS versus Olympus XZ-1, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Kodak and Olympus. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the Z1485 IS (14MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the Z1485 IS (1/1.72") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") feature different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Z1485 IS was unveiled 24 months prior to the XZ-1 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the Z1485 IS scores versus the XZ-1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS and Olympus XZ-1. The full galleries are viewable at Kodak Z1485 IS Gallery and Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z1485 IS over the Olympus XZ-1
| Z1485 IS | XZ-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Kodak Z1485 IS
| XZ-1 | Z1485 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 | January 2009 | Fresher by 24 months | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z1485 IS and Olympus XZ-1
| Z1485 IS | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Kodak Z1485 IS has got exterior dimensions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-1 has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check out the Kodak Z1485 IS versus Olympus XZ-1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the Z1485 IS versus the XZ-1.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Z1485 IS and XZ-1 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing simply by seeing a spec sheet. The visual below should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Z1485 IS and XZ-1.
As you can see, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Z1485 IS with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Kodak Z1485 IS will show more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The older Z1485 IS will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2011-01-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.72" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.4 x 5.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4352 x 3264 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.9 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 lbs) | 275g (0.61 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $179 | $567 |