Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III
91 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aef05/aef054a76ac4c463fa63cf3d2f9990855fc6b928" alt="Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS front Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0394/c039434b1259b0983aa2fa353205f299c35090eb" alt="Ricoh GR Digital III front Ricoh GR Digital III front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/1.72" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Kodak Z1485 IS versus Ricoh GR Digital III, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Kodak and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the Z1485 IS (14MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the Z1485 IS (1/1.72") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The Z1485 IS was revealed 6 months before the GR Digital III so they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a brief summation of how the Z1485 IS matches up against the GR Digital III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS and Ricoh GR Digital III. The full galleries are viewable at Kodak Z1485 IS Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z1485 IS over the Ricoh GR Digital III
Z1485 IS | GR Digital III |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Kodak Z1485 IS
GR Digital III | Z1485 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z1485 IS and Ricoh GR Digital III
Z1485 IS | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2009 | ![]() | July 2009 | Same generation |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Kodak Z1485 IS enjoys physical measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital III has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Look at the Kodak Z1485 IS versus Ricoh GR Digital III in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the Z1485 IS versus the GR Digital III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93fea/93feaa2f6d4cde6fe620ca4a0b428103747279a5" alt="Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z1485 IS and GR Digital III is 91 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba663/ba66346cb2bcdc3760afa17227e4eff8ae46faa8" alt="Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison"
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to see the gap in sensor dimensions only by viewing technical specs. The pic below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Z1485 IS and GR Digital III.
As you can tell, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Z1485 IS using its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Kodak Z1485 IS will provide you with more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60117/60117c15e82031f2db2f41f035d615830dcb5f84" alt="Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison"
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edc95/edc95dc581163d8f3dda9242b46c0985bac22b51" alt="Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Kodak | Ricoh |
Model | Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.72" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 7.4 x 5.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 41.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4352 x 3264 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 1 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 208 grams (0.46 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $179 | $399 |