Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh WG-20
91 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
![Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS front Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/angled/Kodak_EasyShare_Z1485_IS_0.jpg)
![Ricoh WG-20 front Ricoh WG-20 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-20/Ricoh-WG-20-front.jpg)
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh WG-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/1.72" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh WG-20 Overview
In this article, we are evaluating the Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh WG-20, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Kodak and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Z1485 IS (14MP) and the WG-20 (14MP) is fairly close but the Z1485 IS (1/1.72") and WG-20 (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The Z1485 IS was launched 6 years earlier than the WG-20 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick view of how the Z1485 IS grades versus the WG-20 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh WG-20 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS & Ricoh WG-20. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak Z1485 IS Gallery & Ricoh WG-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z1485 IS over the Ricoh WG-20
Z1485 IS | WG-20 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Kodak Z1485 IS
WG-20 | Z1485 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 61 months |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Kodak Z1485 IS and Ricoh WG-20
Z1485 IS | WG-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh WG-20 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Kodak Z1485 IS has got outside measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-20 has measurements of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Compare the Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh WG-20 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the Z1485 IS and the WG-20.
![Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh WG-20 size comparison Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh WG-20 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z1485-IS-vs-Ricoh-WG-20-size-comparison.jpg)
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Z1485 IS and WG-20 is 91 and 93 respectively.
![Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh WG-20 top view buttons comparison Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh WG-20 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z1485-IS-vs-Ricoh-WG-20-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh WG-20 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions merely by viewing specs. The pic below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Z1485 IS and WG-20.
All in all, both of those cameras offer the same exact resolution but different sensor dimensions. The Z1485 IS offers the larger sensor which is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult. The more aged Z1485 IS will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
![Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh WG-20 sensor size comparison Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh WG-20 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z1485-IS-vs-Ricoh-WG-20-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z1485-IS-vs-Ricoh-WG-20-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Ricoh WG-20 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS | Ricoh WG-20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Kodak | Ricoh |
Model | Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS | Ricoh WG-20 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.72" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.4 x 5.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4352 x 3264 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194g (0.43 lb) | 164g (0.36 lb) |
Dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $179 | $370 |