Kodak Z1485 IS vs Samsung SL202
91 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/1.72" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Also Known as PL50
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak Z1485 IS vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Kodak Z1485 IS and Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Kodak and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the Z1485 IS (14MP) and SL202 (10MP) and the Z1485 IS (1/1.72") and SL202 (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Z1485 IS was announced at a similar time to the SL202 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the Z1485 IS matches up against the SL202 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak Z1485 IS vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS and Samsung SL202. The whole galleries are viewable at Kodak Z1485 IS Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z1485 IS over the Samsung SL202
| Z1485 IS | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Kodak Z1485 IS
| SL202 | Z1485 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Kodak Z1485 IS and Samsung SL202
| Z1485 IS | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2009 |  | February 2009 | Same generation |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Kodak Z1485 IS enjoys outer measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Kodak Z1485 IS and Samsung SL202 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the Z1485 IS versus the SL202.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Z1485 IS and SL202 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing only by seeing technical specs. The photograph here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Z1485 IS and SL202.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Z1485 IS using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Kodak Z1485 IS will show more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively.
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS | Samsung SL202 |
| Otherwise known as | - | PL50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.72" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.4 x 5.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 41.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4352 x 3264 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 pounds) | 168g (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $179 | $140 |