Kodak Z1485 IS vs Samsung WB250F
91 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
93 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/1.72" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak Z1485 IS vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Kodak Z1485 IS and Samsung WB250F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Kodak and Samsung. The image resolution of the Z1485 IS (14MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is very similar but the Z1485 IS (1/1.72") and WB250F (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe Z1485 IS was revealed 5 years prior to the WB250F and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the Z1485 IS scores vs the WB250F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak Z1485 IS vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS & Samsung WB250F. The full galleries are viewable at Kodak Z1485 IS Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z1485 IS over the Samsung WB250F
| Z1485 IS | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Kodak Z1485 IS
| WB250F | Z1485 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 48 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Z1485 IS and Samsung WB250F
| Z1485 IS | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z1485 IS enjoys outer measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB250F has proportions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Look at the Kodak Z1485 IS and Samsung WB250F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the Z1485 IS and the WB250F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Z1485 IS and WB250F is 91 and 93 respectively.
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to see the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading specs. The graphic below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Z1485 IS and WB250F.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras posses the exact same MP but not the same sensor measurements. The Z1485 IS features the larger sensor which should make getting shallower depth of field easier. The older Z1485 IS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS | Samsung WB250F |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.72" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.4 x 5.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4352 x 3264 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 lb) | 226g (0.50 lb) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $179 | $250 |