Kodak Z5120 vs Nikon S9700
68 Imaging
39 Features
42 Overall
40
90 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Kodak Z5120 vs Nikon S9700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 232g - 110 x 64 x 35mm
- Released February 2014
- Old Model is Nikon S9500
- New Model is Nikon S9900
Kodak Z5120 vs Nikon S9700 Overview
Following is a comprehensive review of the Kodak Z5120 versus Nikon S9700, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Kodak and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the Z5120 (16MP) and the S9700 (16MP) is very close and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Z5120 was brought out 3 years earlier than the S9700 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Kodak Z5120 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon S9700 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summary of how the Z5120 grades against the S9700 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Kodak Z5120 vs Nikon S9700 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Z5120 and Nikon Coolpix S9700. The entire galleries are available at Kodak Z5120 Gallery and Nikon S9700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z5120 over the Nikon S9700
Z5120 | S9700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9700 over the Kodak Z5120
S9700 | Z5120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | January 2012 | More modern by 25 months | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z5120 and Nikon S9700
Z5120 | S9700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Kodak Z5120 vs Nikon S9700 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Z5120 features outside dimensions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") having a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) and the Nikon S9700 has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak Z5120 versus Nikon S9700 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the Z5120 versus the S9700.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Z5120 and S9700 is 68 and 90 respectively.
Kodak Z5120 vs Nikon S9700 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes merely by researching technical specs. The image below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z5120 and S9700.
As you have seen, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution so you should expect comparable quality of photos however you need to consider the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged Z5120 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Kodak Z5120 vs Nikon S9700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Z5120 vs Nikon S9700 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z5120 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Kodak | Nikon |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z5120 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2014-02-07 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 2456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 99 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.7-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 16 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.90 m | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/30/25p) 320 x 240 (240p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 445g (0.98 lbs) | 232g (0.51 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 110 x 64 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $200 | $350 |