Kodak Z5120 vs Olympus VR-320
68 Imaging
38 Features
42 Overall
39
94 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Kodak Z5120 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak Z5120 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Kodak Z5120 vs Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Kodak and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Z5120 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe Z5120 was revealed 6 months after the VR-320 and they are of a similar age. The two cameras have different body design with the Kodak Z5120 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Z5120 grades against the VR-320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak Z5120 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Z5120 & Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are provided at Kodak Z5120 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z5120 over the Olympus VR-320
| Z5120 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Kodak Z5120
| VR-320 | Z5120 |
|---|
Common features in the Kodak Z5120 and Olympus VR-320
| Z5120 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 | July 2011 | Similar age | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Kodak Z5120 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Z5120 has outer measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") and a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Kodak Z5120 vs Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the Z5120 vs the VR-320.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z5120 and VR-320 is 68 and 94 respectively.
Kodak Z5120 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes only by going over a spec sheet. The picture below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Z5120 and VR-320.
Clearly, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Kodak Z5120 to offer more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs more aggressively.
Kodak Z5120 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak Z5120 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z5120 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z5120 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 2456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.90 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 445 grams (0.98 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $200 | $179 |