Clicky

Kodak Z5120 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
68
Imaging
39
Features
42
Overall
40
Kodak EasyShare Z5120 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Kodak Z5120 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Kodak Z5120
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-676mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
  • Announced January 2012
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced July 2011
  • Successor is Olympus VR-330
Photography Glossary

Kodak Z5120 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Let's look much closer at the Kodak Z5120 vs Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Kodak and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Z5120 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The Z5120 was revealed 6 months after the VR-320 and they are of a similar age. The two cameras have different body design with the Kodak Z5120 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Z5120 grades against the VR-320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Kodak Z5120 over the Olympus VR-320

 Z5120 VR-320 
Manually focus Very precise focus

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Kodak Z5120

 VR-320 Z5120 

Common features in the Kodak Z5120 and Olympus VR-320

 Z5120 VR-320 
IntroducedJanuary 2012July 2011Similar age
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen dimensions
Screen resolution230k230kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Kodak Z5120 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to carry around your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Z5120 has outer measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") and a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Examine the Kodak Z5120 vs Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the Z5120 vs the VR-320.

Kodak Z5120 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z5120 and VR-320 is 68 and 94 respectively.

Kodak Z5120 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Z5120 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes only by going over a spec sheet. The picture below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Z5120 and VR-320.

Clearly, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Kodak Z5120 to offer more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs more aggressively.

Kodak Z5120 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Kodak Z5120 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Z5120 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Z5120 Portrait photography details
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography details
50
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focusing
saves RAW files
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
33
good resolution (14MP)
provides face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Kodak Z5120 Street photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Street photography highlights
55
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (158g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Kodak Z5120 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Sports photography camera
44
amazing zoom range (26-676mm 26.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
painfully slow continuous shooting (6.0 frames/s)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
47
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Kodak Z5120 Travel photography info
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography info
57
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (26mm)
long zoom (676mm)
no Timelapse mode
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
70
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
good resolution (14MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
missing Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.0)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak Z5120
Landscape photography with Olympus VR-320
52
you can focus manually
quite wide (26mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
saves RAW files
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no Timelapse mode
42
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Z5120 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Vlogging camera
26
quite wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focusing
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone socket
32
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
lighter than average in class (158g)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak Z5120 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Z5120 and Olympus VR-320
 Kodak EasyShare Z5120Olympus VR-320
General Information
Make Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare Z5120 Olympus VR-320
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2012-01-10 2011-07-19
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Full resolution 4608 x 2456 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 6400 1600
Min native ISO 125 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-676mm (26.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Max aperture f/2.8-5.6 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 16s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 6.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 8.90 m 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 445 grams (0.98 lb) 158 grams (0.35 lb)
Physical dimensions 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 4 x AA LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $200 $179