Kodak Z5120 vs Ricoh CX3
68 Imaging
39 Features
42 Overall
40
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Kodak Z5120 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched June 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak Z5120 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Kodak Z5120 and Ricoh CX3, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Kodak and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Z5120 (16MP) and CX3 (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Z5120 was introduced 20 months after the CX3 making them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras have different body design with the Kodak Z5120 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the Z5120 scores versus the CX3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak Z5120 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Z5120 & Ricoh CX3. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak Z5120 Gallery & Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z5120 over the Ricoh CX3
| Z5120 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 20 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Kodak Z5120
| CX3 | Z5120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z5120 and Ricoh CX3
| Z5120 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Kodak Z5120 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Z5120 has got outer measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") having a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) and the Ricoh CX3 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak Z5120 and Ricoh CX3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the Z5120 vs the CX3.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Z5120 and CX3 is 68 and 92 respectively.
Kodak Z5120 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes simply by seeing technical specs. The pic underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Z5120 and CX3.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can expect to see the Kodak Z5120 to show greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more recent Z5120 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Kodak Z5120 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Kodak Z5120 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z5120 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z5120 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 2456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 6.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.90 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 445 grams (0.98 lb) | 206 grams (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $200 | $329 |