Kodak Z915 vs Nikon A900
91 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
88 Imaging
45 Features
58 Overall
50
Kodak Z915 vs Nikon A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Launched February 2016
- Renewed by Nikon A1000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak Z915 vs Nikon A900 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Kodak Z915 and Nikon A900, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Kodak and Nikon. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Z915 (10MP) and A900 (20MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Z915 was unveiled 8 years earlier than the A900 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Z915 grades versus the A900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak Z915 vs Nikon A900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z915 & Nikon Coolpix A900. The full galleries are provided at Kodak Z915 Gallery & Nikon A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Nikon A900
| Z915 | A900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Kodak Z915
| A900 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2016 | January 2009 | More recent by 86 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Nikon A900
| Z915 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Kodak Z915 vs Nikon A900 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Kodak Z915 enjoys external measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Nikon A900 has sizing of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Check out the Kodak Z915 and Nikon A900 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is a front view size comparison of the Z915 and the A900.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Z915 and A900 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Kodak Z915 vs Nikon A900 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements just by going over specifications. The photograph below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Z915 and A900.
To sum up, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Nikon A900 to offer more detail having an extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs more aggressively. The older Z915 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak Z915 vs Nikon A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Kodak Z915 vs Nikon A900 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Nikon Coolpix A900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Nikon |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Nikon Coolpix A900 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2016-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 24-840mm (35.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/3.4-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 289 grams (0.64 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $200 | $400 |