Kodak Z915 vs Nikon L110
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
![Kodak EasyShare Z915 front Kodak EasyShare Z915 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Kodak-EasyShare-Z915.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix L110 front Nikon Coolpix L110 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-L110/Nikon-L110-front.jpg)
77 Imaging
35 Features
28 Overall
32
Kodak Z915 vs Nikon L110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 406g - 109 x 74 x 78mm
- Released February 2010
- Earlier Model is Nikon L100
- New Model is Nikon L120
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Z915 vs Nikon L110 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Kodak Z915 and Nikon L110, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Kodak and Nikon. The image resolution of the Z915 (10MP) and the L110 (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The Z915 was revealed 13 months earlier than the L110 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the Z915 matches up against the L110 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Z915 vs Nikon L110 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z915 & Nikon Coolpix L110. The full galleries are provided at Kodak Z915 Gallery & Nikon L110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Nikon L110
Z915 | L110 |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon L110 over the Kodak Z915
L110 | Z915 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 13 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Nikon L110
Z915 | L110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Kodak Z915 vs Nikon L110 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Kodak Z915 has got physical measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Nikon L110 has specifications of 109mm x 74mm x 78mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.1") with a weight of 406 grams (0.90 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak Z915 and Nikon L110 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the Z915 vs the L110.
![Kodak Z915 vs Nikon L110 size comparison Kodak Z915 vs Nikon L110 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z915-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-L110-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Z915 and L110 is 91 and 77 respectively.
![Kodak Z915 vs Nikon L110 top view buttons comparison Kodak Z915 vs Nikon L110 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z915-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-L110-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak Z915 vs Nikon L110 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements just by looking through technical specs. The graphic here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Z915 and L110.
As you have seen, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Nikon L110 to provide you with extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older Z915 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
![Kodak Z915 vs Nikon L110 sensor size comparison Kodak Z915 vs Nikon L110 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z915-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-L110-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak Z915 vs Nikon L110 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak Z915 vs Nikon L110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak Z915 vs Nikon L110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z915-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-L110-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Z915 vs Nikon L110 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Nikon Coolpix L110 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Kodak | Nikon |
Model | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Nikon Coolpix L110 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2010-02-03 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Expeed C2 |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 28-420mm (15.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/3.5-5.4 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 13.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) | 406 gr (0.90 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 109 x 74 x 78mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 2 x AA | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (3 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $200 | $280 |