Kodak Z915 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
91 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
72 Imaging
32 Features
32 Overall
32
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Launched January 2009
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Kodak Z915 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Kodak Z915 vs Olympus SP-565UZ, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the Z915 (10MP) and the SP-565UZ (10MP) is pretty well matched and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Z915 was launched within a month of the SP-565UZ which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the Z915 matches up versus the SP-565UZ for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak Z915 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z915 & Olympus SP-565UZ. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak Z915 Gallery & Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| Z915 | SP-565UZ |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Kodak Z915
| SP-565UZ | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Olympus SP-565UZ
| Z915 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2009 |  | January 2009 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 2.5" |  | 2.5" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Z915 offers external dimensions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Olympus SP-565UZ has dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Look at the Kodak Z915 vs Olympus SP-565UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the Z915 vs the SP-565UZ.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Z915 and SP-565UZ is 91 and 72 respectively.
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by checking technical specs. The picture here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Z915 and SP-565UZ.
As you have seen, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of photographs though you would want to consider the age of the products into consideration.
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2009-01-15 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | 143 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 1 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) | 413 gr (0.91 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 30 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 68 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD Picture Card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $200 | $400 |