Kodak Z915 vs Olympus Tough-3000
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Kodak Z915 vs Olympus Tough-3000, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the Z915 (10MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is fairly close and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Z915 was unveiled 12 months earlier than the Tough-3000 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summary of how the Z915 scores vs the Tough-3000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare Z915 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The full galleries are viewable at Kodak Z915 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Olympus Tough-3000
Z915 | Tough-3000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Kodak Z915
Tough-3000 | Z915 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2010 | January 2009 | Fresher by 12 months | |
Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Olympus Tough-3000
Z915 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Kodak Z915 comes with exterior measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Olympus Tough-3000 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Kodak Z915 vs Olympus Tough-3000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the Z915 against the Tough-3000.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Z915 and Tough-3000 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing only by looking through specifications. The visual here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Z915 and Tough-3000.
To sum up, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus Tough-3000 to render extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The older Z915 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Kodak | Olympus |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Also Known as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2009-01-08 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 2cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 194g (0.43 pounds) | 159g (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | 2 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $200 | $0 |