Kodak Z915 vs Olympus 6020
91 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26


95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6020

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Following is a extensive review of the Kodak Z915 vs Olympus 6020, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Kodak and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the Z915 (10MP) and 6020 (13MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The Z915 was manufactured 13 months before the 6020 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Z915 scores versus the 6020 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare Z915 and Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The entire galleries are provided at Kodak Z915 Gallery and Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Olympus 6020
Z915 | 6020 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Kodak Z915
6020 | Z915 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 13 months |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Olympus 6020
Z915 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Z915 enjoys physical measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6020 has dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak Z915 vs Olympus 6020 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the Z915 and the 6020.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z915 and 6020 is 91 and 95 respectively.

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes only by checking specs. The pic underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Z915 and 6020.
All in all, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus 6020 to resolve greater detail due to its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged Z915 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Olympus |
Model | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
Also Known as | - | mju Tough 6020 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 13MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16 secs | 1/4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) | 122 gr (0.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 2 x AA | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $200 | $279 |