Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-320
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Kodak and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the Z915 (10MP) and TG-320 (14MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Z915 was manufactured 4 years before the TG-320 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the Z915 scores vs the TG-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Z915 & Olympus TG-320. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak Z915 Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Olympus TG-320
| Z915 | TG-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Kodak Z915
| TG-320 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 36 months |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Olympus TG-320
| Z915 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Kodak Z915 has got physical measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Olympus TG-320 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the Z915 compared to the TG-320.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Z915 and TG-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading technical specs. The pic below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Z915 and TG-320.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-320 to offer you more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged Z915 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $200 | $0 |