Clicky

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS

Portability
91
Imaging
33
Features
18
Overall
27
Kodak EasyShare Z915 front
 
Olympus TG-820 iHS front
Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
37
Overall
36

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs

Kodak Z915
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
  • Launched January 2009
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
  • Revealed February 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview

Here, we will be contrasting the Kodak Z915 and Olympus TG-820 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the Z915 (10MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The Z915 was introduced 4 years before the TG-820 iHS which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Z915 grades vs the TG-820 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS

 Z915 TG-820 iHS 

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Kodak Z915

 TG-820 iHS Z915 
RevealedFebruary 2012January 2009Newer by 37 months
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1030k230kSharper screen (+800k dot)

Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Olympus TG-820 iHS

 Z915 TG-820 iHS 
Manually focus No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison

For those who are going to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Kodak Z915 offers physical measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).

Check out the Kodak Z915 and Olympus TG-820 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the Z915 against the TG-820 iHS.

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Z915 and TG-820 iHS is 91 and 92 respectively.

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison

Often, it's hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions only by viewing specs. The picture below may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Z915 and TG-820 iHS.

All in all, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Olympus TG-820 iHS to result in greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged Z915 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Z915 Portrait photography information
Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography information
19
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
low resolution (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
27
has face detect focus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Kodak Z915 Street photography highlights
Olympus TG-820 iHS Street photography highlights
54
image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak Z915
Sports photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
24
image stabilization (Optical)
low max shutter speed (1/1,250 seconds)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
weather sealing
continuous shooting slow (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
low battery life (220 CIPA)
lack of phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak Z915
Travel photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
54
has built in flash
long zoom (350mm)
no Timelapse recording
low resolution (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
59
weather sealing
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
low battery life (220 CIPA)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.9)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak Z915
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
27
image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.5 inch)
low resolution (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
no Timelapse recording
38
really wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
manual mode not available
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
low battery life (220 per charge)
does not have Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak Z915
Vlogging with Olympus TG-820 iHS
24
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
no external microphone jack
33
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
does not have mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Z915 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
 Kodak EasyShare Z915Olympus TG-820 iHS
General Information
Brand Kodak Olympus
Model type Kodak EasyShare Z915 Olympus TG-820 iHS
Category Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Launched 2009-01-08 2012-02-08
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic VI
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35-350mm (10.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-4.8 f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing range 10cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 1,030 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology - HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 16 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/1250 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 2.0 frames per sec 5.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.80 m 3.50 m
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 194 grams (0.43 lb) 206 grams (0.45 lb)
Physical dimensions 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 220 shots
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID 2 x AA LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Price at release $200 $500