Kodak Z915 vs Olympus VG-160
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak Z915 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Below is a in depth analysis of the Kodak Z915 versus Olympus VG-160, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the Z915 (10MP) and VG-160 (14MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Z915 was revealed 4 years earlier than the VG-160 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the Z915 matches up vs the VG-160 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Kodak Z915 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare Z915 and Olympus VG-160. The full galleries are available at Kodak Z915 Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Olympus VG-160
| Z915 | VG-160 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Kodak Z915
| VG-160 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 36 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Olympus VG-160
| Z915 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Kodak Z915 enjoys outside dimensions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Olympus VG-160 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Kodak Z915 versus Olympus VG-160 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the Z915 against the VG-160.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z915 and VG-160 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading technical specs. The visual here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Z915 and VG-160.
As you have seen, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus VG-160 to offer you more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older Z915 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 165 shots |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $200 | $90 |