Clicky

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus XZ-1

Portability
91
Imaging
32
Features
18
Overall
26
Kodak EasyShare Z915 front
 
Olympus XZ-1 front
Portability
88
Imaging
34
Features
51
Overall
40

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs

Kodak Z915
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Announced January 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview

In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Kodak Z915 and Olympus XZ-1, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the Z915 (10MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is pretty similar but the Z915 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") feature different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Z915 was unveiled 24 months prior to the XZ-1 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the Z915 matches up vs the XZ-1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Olympus XZ-1

 Z915 XZ-1 

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Kodak Z915

 XZ-1 Z915 
AnnouncedJanuary 2011January 2009Newer by 24 months
Focus manually More exact focus
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution614k230kClearer screen (+384k dot)

Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Olympus XZ-1

 Z915 XZ-1 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Kodak Z915 comes with outer measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-1 has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).

Look at the Kodak Z915 and Olympus XZ-1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the Z915 and the XZ-1.

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Z915 and XZ-1 is 91 and 88 respectively.

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing technical specs. The image below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Z915 and XZ-1.

As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy the same exact MP albeit different sensor dimensions. The Z915 has the tinier sensor which should make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult. The more aged Z915 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Z915 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus XZ-1 as a Portrait photography camera
19
no manual focus
no external flash support
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
44
focusing manually
has face detection focusing
exports RAW files
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.63")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Kodak Z915 Street photography info
Olympus XZ-1 Street photography info
54
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
59
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/1.63")
heavier than others in class (275 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Kodak Z915 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus XZ-1 as a Sports photography camera
24
image stabilization (Optical)
low max shutter speed (1/1,250 seconds)
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking autofocus
better than average battery power (320 per charge)
low frames per second (2.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.63")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Kodak Z915 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus XZ-1 as a Travel photography camera
54
flash built-in
very long reach (350mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
62
better than average battery power (320 per charge)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than others in class (275 grams)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Z915 Landscape photography information
Olympus XZ-1 Landscape photography information
26
image stabilization (Optical)
no manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
resolution not great (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
54
focusing manually
fairly wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
better than average battery power (320 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.63")
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Z915 Vlogging information
Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging information
24
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone port
31
fairly wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external mic support
heavier than others in class (275g)
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Z915 and Olympus XZ-1
 Kodak EasyShare Z915Olympus XZ-1
General Information
Manufacturer Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare Z915 Olympus XZ-1
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2009-01-08 2011-01-26
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic V
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.63"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 8.07 x 5.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 44.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 3664 x 2752
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 25 11
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-350mm (10.0x) 28-112mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-4.8 f/1.8-2.5
Macro focus distance 10cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 614 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology - OLED
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 16 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1250 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 2.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.80 m 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 194 gr (0.43 pounds) 275 gr (0.61 pounds)
Dimensions 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 34
DXO Color Depth score not tested 18.8
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.4
DXO Low light score not tested 117
Other
Battery life - 320 shots
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model 2 x AA Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $200 $567