Kodak Z915 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Kodak Z915 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the Z915 (10MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is pretty well matched but the Z915 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") have totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Z915 was brought out 4 years prior to the XZ-2 iHS which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the Z915 matches up versus the XZ-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z915 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak Z915 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Z915 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Kodak Z915
XZ-2 iHS | Z915 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2012 | January 2009 | More modern by 48 months | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Z915 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Z915 has physical measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak Z915 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the Z915 compared to the XZ-2 iHS.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the Z915 and XZ-2 iHS is 91 and 85 respectively.
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading through technical specs. The image underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Z915 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can tell, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Z915 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will give extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Z915 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Kodak | Olympus |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 16s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lb) | 346 gr (0.76 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 2 x AA | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $200 | $450 |