Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS
91 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
93 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Released August 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Overview
Following is a detailed overview of the Kodak Z915 versus Pentax WG-1 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Kodak and Pentax. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the Z915 (10MP) and WG-1 GPS (14MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Z915 was released 3 years earlier than the WG-1 GPS which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the Z915 scores against the WG-1 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z915 and Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak Z915 Gallery and Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Pentax WG-1 GPS
| Z915 | WG-1 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 GPS over the Kodak Z915
| WG-1 GPS | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2011 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 31 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Pentax WG-1 GPS
| Z915 | WG-1 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Kodak Z915 offers external measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Pentax WG-1 GPS has measurements of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Kodak Z915 versus Pentax WG-1 GPS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the Z915 against the WG-1 GPS.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Z915 and WG-1 GPS is 91 and 93 respectively.
Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes merely by researching specifications. The image here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Z915 and WG-1 GPS.
To sum up, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Pentax WG-1 GPS to result in more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged Z915 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Pentax |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2011-08-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 16s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 3.90 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) | 167 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $200 | $350 |