Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS
91 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Launched February 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Overview
Below is a extensive review of the Kodak Z915 versus Pentax WG-2 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Kodak and Pentax. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the Z915 (10MP) and WG-2 GPS (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Z915 was unveiled 4 years prior to the WG-2 GPS and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Z915 matches up against the WG-2 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare Z915 and Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS. The full galleries are viewable at Kodak Z915 Gallery and Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
| Z915 | WG-2 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Kodak Z915
| WG-2 GPS | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 37 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Pentax WG-2 GPS
| Z915 | WG-2 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Kodak Z915 offers exterior dimensions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-2 GPS has measurements of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Check the Kodak Z915 versus Pentax WG-2 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the Z915 versus the WG-2 GPS.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Z915 and WG-2 GPS is 91 and 91 respectively.
Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements simply by checking out technical specs. The photograph here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Z915 and WG-2 GPS.
As you can tell, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should anticipate the Pentax WG-2 GPS to produce extra detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The older Z915 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Pentax |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2012-02-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 5.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lb) | 198 gr (0.44 lb) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $200 | $300 |