Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-10
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
![Kodak EasyShare Z915 front Kodak EasyShare Z915 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Kodak-EasyShare-Z915.jpg)
![Pentax WG-10 front Pentax WG-10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Pentax-WG-10/Pentax-WG-10-front.jpg)
93 Imaging
38 Features
34 Overall
36
Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-10 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Kodak Z915 and Pentax WG-10, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Kodak and Pentax. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the Z915 (10MP) and WG-10 (14MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The Z915 was announced 5 years earlier than the WG-10 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the Z915 scores against the WG-10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-10 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z915 and Pentax WG-10. The whole galleries are available at Kodak Z915 Gallery and Pentax WG-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Pentax WG-10
Z915 | WG-10 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-10 over the Kodak Z915
WG-10 | Z915 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 54 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Pentax WG-10
Z915 | WG-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-10 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Kodak Z915 has physical measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-10 has sizing of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Kodak Z915 and Pentax WG-10 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the Z915 versus the WG-10.
![Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-10 size comparison Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-10 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z915-vs-Pentax-WG-10-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Z915 and WG-10 is 91 and 93 respectively.
![Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-10 top view buttons comparison Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-10 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z915-vs-Pentax-WG-10-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-10 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by researching a spec sheet. The pic underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Z915 and WG-10.
Clearly, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Pentax WG-10 to provide you with more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged Z915 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
![Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-10 sensor size comparison Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-10 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z915-vs-Pentax-WG-10-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-10 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z915-vs-Pentax-WG-10-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Z915 vs Pentax WG-10 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Pentax WG-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Kodak | Pentax |
Model | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Pentax WG-10 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2013-06-21 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | 0.7fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 1.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) | 167 grams (0.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $200 | $0 |