Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-30
91 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched October 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Kodak Z915 versus Ricoh WG-30, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Kodak and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the Z915 (10MP) and WG-30 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Z915 was announced 6 years prior to the WG-30 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the Z915 scores vs the WG-30 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Z915 & Ricoh WG-30. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak Z915 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Ricoh WG-30
| Z915 | WG-30 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Kodak Z915
| WG-30 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | October 2014 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 70 months |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Ricoh WG-30
| Z915 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z915 enjoys external dimensions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak Z915 versus Ricoh WG-30 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the Z915 vs the WG-30.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Z915 and WG-30 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes merely by checking out technical specs. The pic here will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Z915 and WG-30.
As you can tell, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-30 to show extra detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Z915 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Ricoh WG-30 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2014-10-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 lbs) | 192g (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $200 | $428 |