Clicky

Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-4

Portability
91
Imaging
32
Features
18
Overall
26
Kodak EasyShare Z915 front
 
Ricoh WG-4 front
Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
44
Overall
41

Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs

Kodak Z915
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
  • Announced January 2009
Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Launched February 2014
Photography Glossary

Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview

Below, we are evaluating the Kodak Z915 and Ricoh WG-4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Kodak and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the Z915 (10MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Z915 was introduced 6 years earlier than the WG-4 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving through a full comparison, below is a concise summation of how the Z915 matches up versus the WG-4 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Ricoh WG-4

 Z915 WG-4 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Kodak Z915

 WG-4 Z915 
LaunchedFebruary 2014January 2009More recent by 61 months
Manual focus More accurate focus
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Ricoh WG-4

 Z915 WG-4 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Kodak Z915 has got physical measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

Look at the Kodak Z915 and Ricoh WG-4 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the Z915 vs the WG-4.

Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-4 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z915 and WG-4 is 91 and 90 respectively.

Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-4 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor measurements merely by checking specifications. The visual underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Z915 and WG-4.

To sum up, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 to resolve extra detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older Z915 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-4 sensor size comparison

Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Z915 Portrait photography details
Ricoh WG-4 Portrait photography details
19
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
MP count low (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
40
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
offers face detection focusing
manual mode not available
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Kodak Z915 Street photography information
Ricoh WG-4 Street photography information
54
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Kodak Z915 Sports photography advice
Ricoh WG-4 Sports photography advice
24
has image stabilization (Optical)
low max shutter speed (1/1,250s)
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
44
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
weather proof
low fps (2.0 frames/s)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (240 per charge)
no phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Kodak Z915 Travel photography details
Ricoh WG-4 Travel photography details
54
built-in flash
great reach (350mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
MP count low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
72
weather proof
megapixel count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
terrible battery pack (240 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Z915 Landscape photography details
Ricoh WG-4 Landscape photography details
26
has image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
lack of Time Lapse function
53
focusing manually
rather wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
weather proof
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not available
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
terrible battery pack (240 per charge)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Z915 Vlogging advice
Ricoh WG-4 Vlogging advice
24
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of mic jack
36
rather wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing external microphone port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Z915 and Ricoh WG-4
 Kodak EasyShare Z915Ricoh WG-4
General Information
Brand Kodak Ricoh
Model type Kodak EasyShare Z915 Ricoh WG-4
Category Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Announced 2009-01-08 2014-02-05
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 25 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35-350mm (10.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-4.8 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing range 10cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 16s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/1250s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 2.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.80 m 10.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 194 grams (0.43 pounds) 230 grams (0.51 pounds)
Dimensions 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 shots
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID 2 x AA D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $200 $330