Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
91 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Updated by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the Kodak Z915 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Kodak and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the Z915 (10MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Z915 was brought out 6 years prior to the WG-4 GPS which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a concise view of how the Z915 scores vs the WG-4 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z915 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak Z915 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| Z915 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Kodak Z915
| WG-4 GPS | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 61 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| Z915 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z915 offers exterior measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Kodak Z915 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the Z915 against the WG-4 GPS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Z915 and WG-4 GPS is 91 and 90 respectively.
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions just by researching specifications. The pic here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Z915 and WG-4 GPS.
To sum up, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should expect the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to render extra detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged Z915 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) | 235 grams (0.52 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $200 | $210 |