Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-70
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Updated by Ricoh WG-80
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-70, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Kodak and Ricoh. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the Z915 (10MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Z915 was unveiled 12 years before the WG-70 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the Z915 matches up versus the WG-70 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Z915 and Ricoh WG-70. The full galleries are viewable at Kodak Z915 Gallery and Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Ricoh WG-70
| Z915 | WG-70 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Kodak Z915
| WG-70 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2020 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 134 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Ricoh WG-70
| Z915 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Kodak Z915 offers external measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-70 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-70 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the Z915 vs the WG-70.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the Z915 and WG-70 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizing merely by going through specs. The graphic below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Z915 and WG-70.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Ricoh WG-70 to provide extra detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The older Z915 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2020-02-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $200 | $280 |
