Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-M1
91 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Kodak Z915 and Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Kodak and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the Z915 (10MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Z915 was brought out 6 years prior to the WG-M1 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the Z915 matches up against the WG-M1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z915 & Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are provided at Kodak Z915 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| Z915 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 2.5" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Kodak Z915
| WG-M1 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 69 months |
Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Ricoh WG-M1
| Z915 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Kodak Z915 enjoys outside measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak Z915 and Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the Z915 vs the WG-M1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Z915 and WG-M1 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by reviewing specifications. The photograph here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Z915 and WG-M1.
Plainly, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Ricoh WG-M1 to offer extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The older Z915 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | (1×) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16 seconds | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 lbs) | 190g (0.42 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $200 | $2,000 |