Kodak Z915 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill
91 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
83 Imaging
55 Features
33 Overall
46
Kodak Z915 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 75mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Announced January 2013
- Old Model is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak Z915 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Kodak Z915 versus Sigma DP3 Merrill, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Kodak and Sigma. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the Z915 (10MP) and DP3 Merrill (15MP) and the Z915 (1/2.3") and DP3 Merrill (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe Z915 was released 5 years before the DP3 Merrill which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Kodak Z915 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP3 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Z915 scores versus the DP3 Merrill when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak Z915 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare Z915 and Sigma DP3 Merrill. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak Z915 Gallery and Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Sigma DP3 Merrill
| Z915 | DP3 Merrill |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP3 Merrill over the Kodak Z915
| DP3 Merrill | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 | January 2009 | More modern by 48 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Sigma DP3 Merrill
| Z915 | DP3 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Kodak Z915 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z915 provides outside dimensions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP3 Merrill has proportions of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check out the Kodak Z915 versus Sigma DP3 Merrill in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the Z915 vs the DP3 Merrill.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Z915 and DP3 Merrill is 91 and 83 respectively.
Kodak Z915 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes only by seeing a spec sheet. The image here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Z915 and DP3 Merrill.
Clearly, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Z915 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Sigma DP3 Merrill will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged Z915 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Kodak Z915 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak Z915 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Sigma DP3 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Sigma |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Sigma DP3 Merrill |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4704 x 3136 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 75mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16s | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250s | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 lbs) | 330g (0.73 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $200 | $1,353 |