Kodak Z950 vs Nikon S32
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22679/226798dc2169a13f9c95c42c23e66e6087c13ce4" alt="Kodak EasyShare Z950 front Kodak EasyShare Z950 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0149f/0149f9e0ec6c13fbfeffac2fa843e325ffbf8490" alt="Nikon Coolpix S32 front Nikon Coolpix S32 front"
90 Imaging
36 Features
23 Overall
30
Kodak Z950 vs Nikon S32 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Announced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-90mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 175g - 108 x 66 x 40mm
- Released February 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Kodak Z950 vs Nikon S32 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Kodak Z950 vs Nikon S32, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Kodak and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the Z950 (12MP) and the S32 (13MP) is pretty well matched but the Z950 (1/2.3") and S32 (1/3") use totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The Z950 was announced 4 years prior to the S32 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the Z950 matches up versus the S32 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Kodak Z950 vs Nikon S32 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z950 and Nikon Coolpix S32. The whole galleries are available at Kodak Z950 Gallery and Nikon S32 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Nikon S32
Z950 | S32 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Nikon S32 over the Kodak Z950
S32 | Z950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | ![]() | June 2010 | More recent by 44 months |
Common features in the Kodak Z950 and Nikon S32
Z950 | S32 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Kodak Z950 vs Nikon S32 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Kodak Z950 has got exterior dimensions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Nikon S32 has sizing of 108mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Examine the Kodak Z950 vs Nikon S32 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the Z950 versus the S32.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65399/65399419baed6b8a75ac870163c47033d4b20df3" alt="Kodak Z950 vs Nikon S32 size comparison Kodak Z950 vs Nikon S32 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Z950 and S32 is 89 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aaaaa/aaaaaf7244974977631da86c5b4bd45be9683e31" alt="Kodak Z950 vs Nikon S32 top view buttons comparison Kodak Z950 vs Nikon S32 top view buttons comparison"
Kodak Z950 vs Nikon S32 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by reading through specifications. The graphic below may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Z950 and S32.
Plainly, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Z950 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Nikon S32 will give more detail with its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The older Z950 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6aaa/e6aaa640aca34e95e1715bb6cbf08a2e0392b54e" alt="Kodak Z950 vs Nikon S32 sensor size comparison Kodak Z950 vs Nikon S32 sensor size comparison"
Kodak Z950 vs Nikon S32 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07061/0706102fd87e4ca46a20222b9d6041f5bb4fd68d" alt="Kodak Z950 vs Nikon S32 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak Z950 vs Nikon S32 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Kodak Z950 vs Nikon S32 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Nikon Coolpix S32 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Nikon |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Nikon Coolpix S32 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2010-06-16 | 2014-02-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 17.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4160 x 3120 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 30-90mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 6cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 7.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.40 m | 3.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920x1080 (30p), VGA 640x480 (30p, 15p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 243g (0.54 pounds) | 175g (0.39 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 108 x 66 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | KLIC-7003 | EN-EL19 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (Approx. 10 seconds ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD / SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $250 | $180 |