Clicky

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ

Portability
89
Imaging
35
Features
29
Overall
32
Kodak EasyShare Z950 front
 
Olympus SP-620 UZ front
Portability
78
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Key Specs

Kodak Z950
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
  • Launched June 2010
Olympus SP-620 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
  • 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
  • Revealed January 2012
  • Previous Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
Photography Glossary

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Overview

The following is a in depth review of the Kodak Z950 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Kodak and Olympus. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the Z950 (12MP) and SP-620 UZ (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The Z950 was released 19 months earlier than the SP-620 UZ which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the Z950 scores against the SP-620 UZ with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ

 Z950 SP-620 UZ 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Kodak Z950

 SP-620 UZ Z950 
RevealedJanuary 2012June 2010Newer by 19 months

Common features in the Kodak Z950 and Olympus SP-620 UZ

 Z950 SP-620 UZ 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurements
Screen resolution230k230kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither provides Touch friendly screen

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Kodak Z950 provides physical measurements of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") along with a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-620 UZ has measurements of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).

Check out the Kodak Z950 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the Z950 compared to the SP-620 UZ.

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Z950 and SP-620 UZ is 89 and 78 respectively.

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ top view buttons comparison

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor dimensions merely by viewing specs. The picture below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Z950 and SP-620 UZ.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Olympus SP-620 UZ to result in more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged Z950 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ sensor size comparison

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Z950 Portrait photography info
Olympus SP-620 UZ Portrait photography info
29
you can focus manually
no external flash support
MP count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
34
resolution is good (16MP)
offers face detection autofocus
no manual focus
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak Z950
Street photography with Olympus SP-620 UZ
52
has image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
more heavy than others (243g)
50
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Kodak Z950 Sports photography info
Olympus SP-620 UZ Sports photography info
27
has image stabilization (Optical)
low max shutter speed (1/1,250s)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
48
incredible zoom range (25-525mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Kodak Z950 Travel photography highlights
Olympus SP-620 UZ Travel photography highlights
52
has built in flash
long reach (350mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
more heavy than others (243 grams)
MP count low (12MP)
does not have selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
61
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (25mm)
great zoom (525mm)
missing Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.1)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Z950 Landscape photography factors
Olympus SP-620 UZ Landscape photography factors
37
you can focus manually
screen is a good size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
MP count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
41
decently wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
manual mode not available
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
missing Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Z950 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus SP-620 UZ as a Vlogging camera
24
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone port
more heavy than others (243g)
28
decently wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection autofocus
slow max aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone port
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Z950 and Olympus SP-620 UZ
 Kodak EasyShare Z950Olympus SP-620 UZ
General Information
Make Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare Z950 Olympus SP-620 UZ
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2010-06-16 2012-01-10
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Highest boosted ISO 3200 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-350mm (10.0x) 25-525mm (21.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-4.8 f/3.1-5.8
Macro focus range 6cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3"
Display resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1/8 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/1250 secs 1/1500 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.40 m 6.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 243g (0.54 pounds) 435g (0.96 pounds)
Dimensions 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7003 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $250 $199