Kodak Z950 vs Olympus SH-3
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Revealed June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Older Model is Olympus SH-2
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak Z950 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Here is a in depth comparison of the Kodak Z950 vs Olympus SH-3, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the Z950 (12MP) and SH-3 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Z950 was released 6 years earlier than the SH-3 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the Z950 grades against the SH-3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak Z950 vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Z950 and Olympus Stylus SH-3. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak Z950 Gallery and Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Olympus SH-3
| Z950 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Kodak Z950
| SH-3 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 | June 2010 | Fresher by 68 months | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Z950 and Olympus SH-3
| Z950 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera, you should factor its weight and size. The Kodak Z950 has got outer dimensions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Olympus SH-3 has specifications of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak Z950 vs Olympus SH-3 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the Z950 compared to the SH-3.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Z950 and SH-3 is 89 and 88 respectively.
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reading technical specs. The graphic underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Z950 and SH-3.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Olympus SH-3 to offer greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images much more aggressively. The older Z950 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2016-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 6cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/8s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 11.5 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.40 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 243 gr (0.54 pounds) | 271 gr (0.60 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 pictures |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | KLIC-7003 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $250 | $579 |