Kodak Z950 vs Olympus Tough-3000
89 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Revealed June 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 3000
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak Z950 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Kodak Z950 versus Olympus Tough-3000, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the Z950 (12MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Z950 was revealed 6 months after the Tough-3000 and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the Z950 grades against the Tough-3000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak Z950 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Z950 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The full galleries are provided at Kodak Z950 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| Z950 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Kodak Z950
| Tough-3000 | Z950 |
|---|
Common features in the Kodak Z950 and Olympus Tough-3000
| Z950 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2010 | January 2010 | Same age | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Kodak Z950 comes with outside dimensions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") along with a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Olympus Tough-3000 has specifications of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Kodak Z950 versus Olympus Tough-3000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the Z950 against the Tough-3000.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z950 and Tough-3000 is 89 and 94 respectively.
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes simply by going through specs. The image below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z950 and Tough-3000.
As you can plainly see, both cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical MP and you can expect comparable quality of photos although you would want to consider the launch date of the cameras into account.
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
| Also referred to as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing distance | 6cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.40 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 243g (0.54 lbs) | 159g (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | KLIC-7003 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $250 | $0 |