Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-4
89 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Revealed June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-3
- Updated by Olympus TG-5
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the Z950 (12MP) and TG-4 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Z950 was launched 5 years prior to the TG-4 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the Z950 matches up against the TG-4 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z950 and Olympus Tough TG-4. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak Z950 Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Olympus TG-4
| Z950 | TG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Kodak Z950
| TG-4 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | April 2015 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 58 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z950 and Olympus TG-4
| Z950 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z950 has got outside measurements of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-4 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-4 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the Z950 against the TG-4.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Z950 and TG-4 is 89 and 90 respectively.
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing simply by researching specs. The visual underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Z950 and TG-4.
All in all, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should expect the Olympus TG-4 to provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older Z950 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2015-04-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 6cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.40 m | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 243 grams (0.54 lbs) | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | KLIC-7003 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $250 | $379 |