Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VH-410
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Announced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched August 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
Following is a in depth assessment of the Kodak Z950 versus Olympus VH-410, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the Z950 (12MP) and VH-410 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Z950 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the VH-410 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief summary of how the Z950 matches up against the VH-410 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z950 & Olympus VH-410. The entire galleries are available at Kodak Z950 Gallery & Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Olympus VH-410
| Z950 | VH-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Kodak Z950
| VH-410 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2012 | June 2010 | More modern by 26 months | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Z950 and Olympus VH-410
| Z950 | VH-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Kodak Z950 has got external dimensions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Olympus VH-410 has measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Kodak Z950 versus Olympus VH-410 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the Z950 against the VH-410.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Z950 and VH-410 is 89 and 95 respectively.
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes merely by researching technical specs. The picture below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Z950 and VH-410.
As you can tell, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus VH-410 to result in more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged Z950 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Olympus VH-410 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Olympus VH-410 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-06-16 | 2012-08-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 6cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/8s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.40 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 243g (0.54 lb) | 152g (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | KLIC-7003 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $250 | $186 |