Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VR-320
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Kodak Z950 and Olympus VR-320, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the Z950 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is relatively close and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Z950 was announced 13 months earlier than the VR-320 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the Z950 scores vs the VR-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Z950 and Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are viewable at Kodak Z950 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Olympus VR-320
Z950 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Kodak Z950
VR-320 | Z950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2011 | June 2010 | More modern by 13 months |
Common features in the Kodak Z950 and Olympus VR-320
Z950 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Kodak Z950 comes with exterior dimensions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Kodak Z950 and Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the Z950 vs the VR-320.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Z950 and VR-320 is 89 and 94 respectively.
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes purely by researching specifications. The pic below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z950 and VR-320.
Plainly, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus VR-320 to render greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged Z950 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Olympus |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Olympus VR-320 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 6cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/8 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.40 m | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 243g (0.54 lb) | 158g (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | KLIC-7003 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $250 | $179 |