Clicky

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
89
Imaging
35
Features
29
Overall
32
Kodak EasyShare Z950 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Kodak Z950
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
  • Launched June 2010
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released July 2011
  • Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Following is a thorough assessment of the Kodak Z950 and Olympus VR-320, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the Z950 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is relatively close and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Z950 was announced 13 months earlier than the VR-320 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the Z950 scores vs the VR-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Olympus VR-320

 Z950 VR-320 
Focus manually Dial exact focus

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Kodak Z950

 VR-320 Z950 
ReleasedJuly 2011June 2010More modern by 13 months

Common features in the Kodak Z950 and Olympus VR-320

 Z950 VR-320 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen sizing
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen Neither comes with Touch screen

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Kodak Z950 comes with exterior dimensions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Check out the Kodak Z950 and Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the Z950 vs the VR-320.

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Z950 and VR-320 is 89 and 94 respectively.

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes purely by researching specifications. The pic below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z950 and VR-320.

Plainly, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus VR-320 to render greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged Z950 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Z950 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography highlights
29
focusing manually
no external flash support
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
33
good MP (14 megapixels)
provides face detection focusing
manual focus not available
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Kodak Z950 as a Street photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Street photography camera
52
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
more heavy than competitors (243g)
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Kodak Z950 Sports photography features
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography features
27
built in image stabilization (Optical)
low max shutter speed (1/1,250s)
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
47
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14MP)
provides tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak Z950
Travel photography with Olympus VR-320
52
has built in flash
great zoom (350mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors (243 grams)
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
70
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
good MP (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
does not have Timelapse function
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak Z950
Landscape photography with Olympus VR-320
37
focusing manually
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
42
quite wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
does not have Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Z950 Vlogging advice
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging advice
24
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone jack
more heavy than competitors (243 grams)
32
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focusing
lighter than competition in class (158g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external microphone support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Z950 and Olympus VR-320
 Kodak EasyShare Z950Olympus VR-320
General Information
Brand Kodak Olympus
Model type Kodak EasyShare Z950 Olympus VR-320
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2010-06-16 2011-07-19
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Maximum boosted ISO 3200 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35-350mm (10.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-4.8 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing range 6cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1/8 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/1250 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.40 m 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 243g (0.54 lb) 158g (0.35 lb)
Dimensions 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7003 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $250 $179